RATE THIS BLOG - click hereBlogarama

Site Meter
The World According to Pete

Subscribe in NewsGator Online blog archives

Recommended Weblogs of Equal or Lesser Value
davezilla
Heart Failure
How Not To Fly
Ludic Log
Mirth&Musings
Monkey Cage
PeteAccordingToMe
Porn Clerk Girl
Random Acts of Reality
Stacey Nightmare

Good-N-Plenty Sites of Interest
Bob from Accounting
Bushisms
Church Sign Generator
Jim Goad
Modern Drunkard
Rant of the Week
Retro Future
'Salon Apocalypse'
Slash & Burn

BLOGOSPHERE News & Reviews

BlogCritics

Alpha Bloggers
Blogging as Journalism
Starting a Blog
You've Got Blog

31 Flavors of Blog
Weblog Review

Confessions of an Internet Junkie!
My 'Generic Blog'

Pete Media
Pete Vs. the Virgin Mary ('89), then...
...'New Times' calls Pete a 'creep'('97)
Yucca Video/TV Clip
Pete out-predicts Psychics ('99)
Pete's research quoted in 'Earth Changes' book ('01)
Art For Pete's Sake ('03)
MEDIA PETROS

Cool Comix, Fun Flix & Groovy Tunes
Day by Day
Red Meat
Way Lay

I, Doll
Rainbow TV

Resonance Radio
Strangely Familiar

Damn Fine Art
Sarina Brewer
Joe Coleman
David Ho
Jenny Ignaszewski
ManWoman
Mark Mothersbaugh
Pete Petrisko
Mark Ryden
Isabel Samaras
Shag
Chris Winkler
Joel-Peter Witkin

Web Cam Fun!
Bubble Cam
Continental Drift Cam
Deformed Frog Cam
JFK Assassin Cam
Peeling Paint Cam

contact...
Email Pete about the world. He might reply. All work herein (c) 2002-2004 by Peter Petrisko

This page is powered by Blogger.

Monday, June 30, 2003
(If you're still accessing this blog via the 06_01 archive URL, update to 07_01 for the latest. Or use the main page URL.)


[ JUST AN OLD-FASHIONED LOVE SONG ]

It's honesty time. For almost two months, my "love life" has been on 'life support' and it's about time to make that hard decision: Do I pull the plug and simply allow it to die the peaceful death it so richly deserves, or do I continue to hold out for some sort of miracle in which it spontaneously comes out of the coma its been in?

I'm not sure what to do, but I am firmly convinced that women want one thing and one thing only...

Three letters: S. E. X.

Not that I'm complaining when it's happening, mind you, but afterwards I feel so dirty and used.

I am so much more than just the piece of meat between my legs.

I am not a penis!

I am a human being!

And women have been known to say that men only want sex. This is what they call "subterfuge", boys and girls. In my opinion, not only do women just want sex, but also they can get a lot more of it because, let's face it, when you're a horny chick it's much easier to find a willing partner than it is if you're a man in a similar situation. But this fact is rarely spoken of because, unlike with guys, the girls don't brag to all their friends afterward. Or, if they do, those girlfriends know how to keep their mouths shut.

As an aside, god forbid if the dreaded R-word should ever pass a man's lips. For those who don't know, that word is "relationship". At this point, I feel I must profusely apologize to all the women readers for my use of such offensive language. I'm really really sorry. Please don't judge me.

I remember one woman I was seeing who once commented that it was men - yes, men! - who only wanted sex.

That poor deluded bitch.

To show her just how wrong she was, I informed her that - from that moment on - her and I would not be having sex again. Ever.

We could still get nekkid, still sleep in the same bed, and I'd still be as affectionate as ever in both private and public. But no more horizontal mambo.

I would no longer be the dancing fool.

So that relationship lasted about two more weeks before she broke up with me.

Why did she do that? Because she just wanted to get laid, which she did shortly thereafter.

But not with me, dammit. I stuck to my guns! So to speak. But let's leave my sticky gun out of this, shall we?

On a related note, I've begun to realize lately that women hardly ever say what they really mean.

And by "hardly ever" I mean "never".

They say they have a boyfriend when they don't, or they say they don't when, in fact, they do.

They flirt with guys and - us being guys and, therefore, stupid by definition - we take it as a personal validation of our manliness. But it isn't. That's just the way girls express themselves.

Of course, guys express themselves by then grabbing the flirty girl's ass - so whomever said guys have a problem expressing emotion was obviously an idiot.

In the weeks since my "love life" was hooked up to a machine to keep it breathing, I find that more than one woman I once dated has called when her life has gone to hell. I've somehow become the boy they call when they need to vent or want a shoulder to cry on. It's all about depression and tears when they make that call.

Yes, somewhere along the line I've become the "designated gay male friend" and, hell, I'm NOT EVEN GAY.

So how the hell did I get myself into this situation? As one girl put it, "Pete, you're a bad boy with a surprisingly sensitive side."

Please, God, kill me now.

I suppose these former flames appreciate that, and my mad listening skills, because, as one of them recently said to me, "I hope you know I'd do anything for you, Pete."

When she said that, my first thought, of course, was, "Great, then how about coming right over and sucking my dick?"

But I didn't say it out loud. I only thought it. I may be a bad boy but, hell, I'm sensitive.

Have I mentioned the part about wanting God to strike me dead yet?

Love, at least in my experience, is not so much Kismet as it is Snake Eyes. Sorry for getting a bit allegorical there with the games, but I wanted to put it in a way the female readers would understand. Women understand games and, by gosh, they should, being as good at them as they are.

Is it too much to expect a woman to be honest and open?

For those women now reading who don't happen to have a dictionary nearby, and are therefore having difficulty comprehending that last sentence...

Honest (adj.) honorable; truthful; trustworthy.

Open (adj.) not hidden or secret; candid; direct.

Ironically, at this point, if a woman were to walk up to me and state point-blank, "I'm attracted to you. I'd like to date you in the hopes a deep and meaningful romantic relationship might develop"; I'd be asking myself, "What do you suppose she meant by THAT?!?"

I've never much enjoyed puzzles. So I guess I'm pretty much fucked at this point. Or not, as the case may be.

Please, don't get me wrong: I'm not misogynistic. I don't hate women. I'm just none too thrilled with the gender at this particular moment.

Heck, maybe I've completely misread the situation. Perhaps women just want the same thing men do at the end of the day: Somebody special to hold onto during that long night.

No, that can't be it. They just wanna get laid.

Perhaps rap pioneers Salt 'N Pepa said it best, when those fly girls sang...

"Let's talk about sex, baby (sing it)
Let's talk about you and me (sing it, sing it)
Let's talk about all the good things
And the bad things that may be
Let's talk about sex (come on)
Let's talk about sex (do it)
Let's talk about sex (uh-huh)
Let's talk about sex"

[]

(If any female readers want to email me a rebuttal, for posting on this blog, please do. 'The World...' reserves the right to edit for brevity. So, if any of you broads have the balls, then by all means do so. Any blog-published rebuttals become the property of 'The World...')

THE REBUTTAL:

Courtney, @ http://courtney.blog-city.com/ , was the one woman NOT having sex and, therefore, had time to respond. Thanks, grrlfriend! But if you'd like a little advice, I'd say: Quit the blogging... and get to dawging!

She wrote: ''Loved this entry! One thing doesn't make sense though. If all women only want sex, then why is it so easy for women to find a willing partner? As you said:

"In my opinion, not only do women just want sex, but also they can get a lot more of it because, let's face it, when you're a horny chick it's much easier to find a willing partner than it is if you're a man in a similar situation."

It seems that the superfluous "supply" [men ready to have sex] does not reflect a high "demand" [women looking for sex]. In fact, the opposite seems true. The high numbers of men ready to have sex suggests that there aren't enough women willing to have sex with them, thereby satisfying that demand.''

TO WHICH I CAN ONLY SAY:

1. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the female population slightly outnumbers that of men overall, although the number of males is growing at a faster pace and, in fact, men slightly outnumber women in the 30-years old and under group (i.e., the "yes, we're Still Having Sex group.") While I don't have the numbers for the world in front of me - hey, I'm American, so what do I care about the rest of the world, right? - historically more males survive childhood than do women. Take that for what it's worth.

2. While all women only want, and get, sex, the same may not hold true for men. Don't get me wrong... all men want it. But not all of them get it. It appears only a "select pool" of men are "sex worthy" and the rest are shit out of luck.

3. I never stated emphatically that women only wanted heterosexual sex. Perhaps lesbianism is far more rampant than anybody suspects. And, quite frankly, with some of the men out there, who can blame 'em?






posted by Pete 12:07 AM
Thursday, June 26, 2003
While I don't usually review specific events I've attended, every once in a while something comes down the pike that's worthy of mention. Written in a style that harkens back to the days of 'burlesque' ("It's a Review! It's a Journalistic Period Piece!") a 'translation' guide to the archaic slang I use can be found by doing a search of "1920s+slang" &/or "1930s+slang" on google.com. Remarkably, being an aficionado of the period culture, I actually use some of these words in everyday conversation. But you might not...
-

[ BURLESQUEFEST 2003 - IT WAS THE CAT'S PAJAMAS ]

The dames of "Burlesquefest 2003" had pitched their tent in my town for one night - and one night only - so a friend and I put our glad rags on and took the tin can on the road to have a look-see.

The show promised to be a real hum-dinger and it didn't disappoint.

Inspired by the burlesque/vaudeville days of yore, this touring company is just one of a growing number making tracks nowadays, livening up joints in pure sockdollager fashion.

Burlesque is back, guys and dolls, and it's dripping with irony and sex appeal.

At the show, the audience was a variety of hipsters (both straight & lesbian couples), with a smattering of much older (65+) couples that, perhaps, were nostalgic for the tease.

Yesiree, Bob, it was fun for all ages.

Then there were the single guys who just wanted to see some bodacious bubs and curvy cans. Woof! Woof!

The show began with the Oracle Dance trio, kicking up their heels chorus-line style, before stripping down to their skivvies. These skirts were regular Oliver Twists. And not a bug-eyed betty among them!

The crowd hooped and hollered and, as the lights went down at the conclusion of this opening number, some palooka in the audience shouted, "Bring on the whores!"

What a dindy pill he was. Some fellas have no manners whatever, being so full of booshwash as they are.

The rest of the evening - over two hours long - alternated between bump and grind set-pieces (sometimes backed by pre-recorded musical standards circa the first half of the 20th century, others featuring a live band) all teased out by the gaggle of janes of Burlesquefest.

When the vampy dolls did a costume change (or, more accurately, went backstage to redress), the hall was filled by the tight musical stylings of DeVotchKa - a band with an eastern European/punk hybrid vibe - that was nothing short of hot socks.

Highlights included a scantily clad Catherine D'Lish twirling on the catbird's seat in a giant birdcage, while water from a showerhead splashed down over her.

Suffering succotash, puddy tat! That bird has a gorgeous set of gams, believe you me. Betty Grable had nothing on her.

The Mae Westesque Miss Kitty Crimson came out hard-boiled, wearing baggy black pants and a gray trench coat, then proceeded to strip down to sequined panties and strategically placed tassels in time to a live rendition of "The Theme to 'The Pink Panther'".

Jeepers creepers, I blew my wig!

The evening was held together by the double-entendred banter of MC Kitten on the Keys , who also shared a few musical selections of her own. A brief off the cob dialog with a cat hand puppet segued into the song "My Friend's Pussy", which was followed later by "Grandma Sells My Panties on eBay" (no explanation necessary for that one.)

The swanky fun ended with Miss D'Lish taking a swish in a giant champagne glass, nearly splashing some rubes in the front row, before striking that archetypal Girl-In-Large-Champagne-Glass pose. The crowd went from percolating to panic by the end of this showstopper.

A little naughty, definitely bawdy, and not a dead hoofer or cement mixer in the bunch - Burlesquefest featured a little song, a little dance and a little seltzer in the pants.

With the twist of an ankle, or the shake of a hip, the troupe succeeded in returning burlesque to its roots - when "stripping" was still an art form, one that took talent, practice, and subtlety of detail.

Not like nowadays, when pretty much any hard-bodied chick that can find the pole can call herself a stripper. Whether she has style or finesse -- or not.

Maybe I'm a little jaded. One too many ex-girlfriends who were strippers.

However, I found Burlesquefest to be "ironically refreshing". If nothing else, it reaffirmed what I've long suspected. I was born about 50 years too late.

If you didn't catch its show during the summer tour then heads up, pally -- another, slightly different, U.S. tour starts this fall. So shake a leg!

(For info, copy/paste URL: http://www.burlesquefest.com/ )

[]

[ The preceding was originally published on blogcritics.org ]

posted by Pete 4:14 AM
Saturday, June 21, 2003
EMAIL QUOTE OF THE WEEK: "Pete, you're either an utter genius or a complete idiot. I haven't decided which yet."
-

[ KOOKS' DAY ]

Once again, the time is fast approaching for the latest of 'net-inspired "holidays". Yes, June 26 is officially "KOOKS' DAY" or, as they call it in Canada, "All Kooks' Day."

KOOK (n.) a person regarded as silly, eccentric, crazy, etc.

The holiday is inspired by, and celebrated on the date of the death of, Earl Curley - self-proclaimed psychic, 'net rabble-rouser, and a man whose biggest claim to fame was being sued by uberskeptic James Randi.

It was started a year to the date of Curley's death by 'net users who, ah, missed his unique brand of kookiness and wanted to honor (?) his "contributions" to the field.

Ironically, while the Internet has raised the level of infamy a kook can reach globally, it has also been instrumental in lowering the bar of kookdom in general.

Once upon a time, one had to be truly kooky to earn - yes, earn! - the title of Kook. It used to be, in most families, that eccentric uncle who was considered a kook. Nowadays, in this 'net "family", everybody *and* their mother might be labeled a kook.

Case in point, one person currently posting heavily to Usenet newsgroups who many call "kook" is, in reality, little more than an astrologer with very poor social skills and a bad temper.

Other mislabeled "kooks":

The overmedicated. The under medicated. Speed freaks. Neat freaks. Ultra-right wingers. Hippified tree-huggers. The mildly depressed. The sexually repressed. Headbangers. Racist ballplayers. Sex chat room men - and the women who love them. News junkies. Regular junkies. Third-party candidates and their political flunkies. Those who go on faith. Uberskeptics with no faith in their fellow man. Huffers. Tweakers. Guys wearing oversized pants and unlaced sneakers. The paranoid. The unfriendly. Anyone at a karaoke bar performing a Neil Diamond medley.

Then again, perhaps it's just me.

My first 'kook' was such classic kookdom that, maybe, he ruined it for all of those who followed.

You be the judge.
-

MY FIRST KOOK

(Warning: Due to content the following might be objectionable to some. Please, if offended by sexual overtones, *skip* this account.)

Some 15-odd years ago, while waiting to board a Greyhound bus at 2AM, I looked up to see a peculiar sight.

An old, slightly balding man with two days' worth of stubble pacing back and forth. He wore faded jeans covered with red markered phrases written down his pant legs. "Democrats are Communists", "Reagan was Right" and "Jesus is Coming - Are You Ready?" leapt from his legs. He carried a large white box under his arm.

As the terminal loudspeaker that announced my bus was boarding, I must have been vibing like a kook magnet because this man made a beeline towards me.

"This your bus?" he asked.

When I answered in the affirmative, he said, "Mine too! You mind helping me?" and pointed to a second box a few feet away.

I had no luggage. I had gotten a cheap, visceral thrill from his pants. So I helped him with the other box.

On board, the man stuffed his boxes overhead and then sat down next to me. As the bus began its journey into night, he said, "Do you like my pants? My name is Hugh Clayton, but I'm sometimes known as 'Chickenman'."

The nickname should've been a big clue as to what would follow, but I was still young and oh-so naive.

As the bus drove on, 'Chickenman' explained his mission. He had one thousand copies of a many-paged manifesto, which he was taking to Washington DC to give to as many Republican congressional members as he could.

He didn't plan to give any to the Democrats, calling them, "a collection of liberal degenerates, militant homosexuals, slobs, bums, traitors and worthless bureaucrats." He added, "They should all be executed if you ask me."

"Aren't you being a little rough?" I asked.

"No, not at all," he exclaimed, "Give them even one inch and they'll run right over you. See, you're young but I've been around. I'm 52 years old. I was once a psychologist. I graduated from Harvard."

As the road went on, 'Chickenman' railed against smokers, social drinkers, overeaters, those who watch "low grade TV" and people who don't wash often enough.

He spoke of the younger generation who, in his experience, was a collection of "dense blockheads" and "base idiots". People with no brains who, in his words, "have no business throwing their half-witted anomalies in society's face" by reproducing.

After over an hour of his monologue, Clayton got uncharacteristically quiet for a few minutes.

He then leaned over and whispered, in an almost conspiratorial tone, "Want me to feel your cock?"

"No," I replied, "I'm a bit tired from traveling and think I'd rather try to sleep a bit."

Yeah, like I'd be caught sleeping on the bus at that point.

Becoming a bit flustered, he stammered something about how he thought that was a good idea himself, so 'Chickenman' quickly got up and moved down the aisle, finally reseating himself some seven rows back.

Later, as the bus pulled into the next city, I felt a hand on my shoulder.

I looked up to see 'Chickenman' standing there.

He thrust a thick, red book at me.

"I want you to have this book," he said. As I took it in my hand, he quickly turned around and went back to his seat.

I peered more closely at the worn book he had given me.

It was, evidently, his personal a copy of Hitler's "Mein Kampf".

Fully annotated and highlighted throughout by 'Chickenman' himself, with plenty of hand written notes in the page margins.

That was the last I heard from Hugh "Chickenman" Clayton. Gone, but not forgotten, as I don my tin-foil hat and remember him on this, the most special of days, "Kooks' Day" - June 26th.

So, I hope you'll join me and celebrate by getting a little crazy!

[]

NOTE TO READERS: If you haven't read the early ARCHIVES yet, and want to do so, now would be the time. Nov-Jan won't be available as of next week.

posted by Pete 12:49 AM
Tuesday, June 17, 2003
[ OPRAH'S NEW BOOK CLUB: A REAL PAGE-TURNER!]

It is the best of times and the worst of times, as Oprah Winfrey opens up a new chapter on her TV show's "Book Club" beginning June 18th, 2003.

I'm so excited my nipples are harder than Oprah's on a cold Chicago morning.

Speaking to members of the Association of American Publishers last spring, Winfrey said that the new book club would focus on classic literary works.

In other words, the books nobody ever reads. Except those of us forced to do so back in high school.

Some of us are still very bitter over that one.

So, why did Winfrey close her first "book club"?

Maybe the only 'experts' should could get to talk about those books were the authors themselves. People who are experts on one thing and one thing only - themselves.

Yeah, that always makes for good television. We don't see enough of that these days.

Or maybe it was the guy who turned down her offer to have his latest novel picked as the book selection.

Reportedly, he really hurt Winfrey's feelings. The "book club" ended shortly thereafter.

Or it might be the fact that people at home in the middle of the afternoon aren't exactly known as voracious readers.

Who's to say?

According to Winfrey's website announcement, "The new club, tentatively titled 'Traveling with the Classics,' will likely feature selections three to five times a year, to allow readers to take their time and steep themselves in a particular work or author."

Obviously, the breakneck pace of one book per month is too much to ask. Winfrey's viewers lead busy lives. They have much to do each day. For example, watching Oprah on TV. And reading "O - The Oprah Magazine". Not to mention getting on the Oprah website for the latest on Miss O., or checking their email to see if another "Oprah Alert" has arrived.

The new club is titled, 'Traveling with the Classics' because, as oprah.com explains, "Each show will originate from a site connected with the selection - the author's birthplace, the book's setting or some other relevant locale."

So, for example, if the selection is Thoreau's "Walden", that show will originate from... well, from a shopping mall, because Walden Pond was drained when it was built, quite a few years ago. (Don't worry! I'm just kidding. The pond is still there.)

With Winfrey's core audience in mind, I nominate a few "classic literary works" myself. Selections pending the official "Oprah Seal of Approval", of course...

1. "Naked Lunch" by William S. Burroughs

A lovely little tale of heroin addiction and gay sex, told under the auspices of social satire. It created quite the brouhaha when first published.

The show can originate from Lawrence, Kansas. Alternately, it can be set in the back alley of any major metropolitan city, in whichever "shooting gallery" the heroin addicts are congregating on the day of taping.

2. "Abortion: An Historical Romance" by Richard Brautigan

Boy works at small library where only single copies of handwritten/typed books, brought in by frustrated wannabe writers, are shelved. Boy meets girl. Girl gets pregnant. It's 1966, so they travel south of the border for that abortion. It's all so romantic.

Not his best novel, but it'll resonate with Oprah's desired demographic. The relevant locale? Wherever the trout are biting. Or, the book's setting - an abortion clinic in Mexico. Whichever.

3. "Women" by Charles Bukowski

A touching and sentimental book about some crazy broads the author knew. Oh, did I say "touching and sentimental"? I meant loutish and misogynistic. Well, close enough.

For Bukowski on Winfrey, any seedy bar will do.

I guess we'll see if my selections are Winfrey's selections too, huh?

Perhaps Winfrey is setting her sights too high with literary classics. Maybe she should consider taking it down a notch.

In that case, I recommend:

1. "Classic X-Men" (the Chris Claremont years)

2. "Daredevil" (the classic Frank Miller years)

Whatever Winfrey decides, I plan to boycott her "dead authors only" policy. To that end, even as you read this, my friends and I are combing the video archives so that we can watch "classic daytime talk shows" only.

Instead of Oprah Winfrey, my friends and I - or, as I refer to us, "Pete's Talk Show Club" - will be viewing a different "classic" show over the course of each month.

The "Pete's Talk Show Club" monthly schedule, so far, will be:

MONTH 1: "Donahue"
The original long-running daytime groundbreaker, not the painful-to-watch and now cancelled MSNBC mini-series.

Club Talking Points - "How to Look Really Really Earnest" and "How to Pander to Viewers, in a Sad Ratings Grab, By Wearing a Skirt On-Air."

MONTH 2: "The Morton Downey Jr. Show"
He's loud. He's proud. He's Morty. If you're too young to remember Downey, think "Springer on Steroids."

Daytime was never the same after Downey. We all owe him a big debt of gratitude. Too bad they can't bring his show back, with all-new episodes. What with his being dead and all.

MONTH 3: "Carnie!"
Hosted by erstwhile pop singer Carnie Wilson. This one has been selected so that, the next time club members see that touching yet hopeful commercial on TV with Wilson telling us how she lost some 300-odd pounds through the "miracle of surgery", we'll all truly appreciate the difficulties she went through. By viewing her when she was still fantastically huge.

MONTH 4: "The Richard Bey Show"
Club Talking Points: "How to Leer at the Camera" and "How to Make Fun of Stupid Guests So They Don't Know You're Doing It"

Bey was a poor man's Springer, but what the hell do you expect by Month Four? Geraldo? Not likely, pal.

So good luck, Oprah! I wish you all the best. But I won't be watching. Nor reading your selections.

The library is now closed.

posted by Pete 12:17 AM
Tuesday, June 10, 2003
[ BODYSLAMMED BY CHRIST ]

I was flipping through the television stations the other night, when I turned to TBN - Trinity Broadcasting Network; home of Paul and Jan Crouch, Benny Hinn, M.C. Hammer and other born-agains - and, to my amazement, saw professional wrestling.

I knew wrestling was a big draw, but come on now.

Two guys were beating the living hell out of each other in front of a cheering audience.

After the match, the lights went up, and one of the wrestlers - former WCW superstar Sting - took to the microphone.

He began witnessing, while in full Stingolicious black and white face makeup, to the audience.

It was a litany of misery.

He had tons of money, women throwing themselves at him, and he rode around in limos all the time.

It was pure hell on earth.

If I was a millionaire having sex with chicks in a limo, I wouldn't be bellyaching but, then, I'm not Sting.

Yet with everything he had, he said, "I felt empty inside."

"I had been wrestling with God for years," he added, "and I was losing the match."

So he turned his life over to Jesus Christ, and now performs evangelical "grudge matches" on TBN.

But, hey, he's as happy as the proverbial clam.

Then, Sting turned to another wrestler - the "Million Dollar Man" (of 'Wrestlemania 8' fame) - and began preaching to him.

Since 'Mil' was a designated "bad guy", it just followed there was some soul saving to do there.

But halfway through Sting's "god spiel", the 'Mil' interrupted him and revealed, "Brother, I'll let you in on a little secret - I was saved some ten years ago!"

The cheers from the crowd eclipsed those heard during the previous match.

As it turns out, after the heady success of Wrestlemania, 'Mil' spent the whole night drinking and having hot limo sex, and then called his wife the next morning.

"She was a good woman," 'Mil' said, "she never called me in the middle of the night, when I was on the road, to make sure I was where I was supposed to be."

Her bad, I suppose. But, somehow, his wife had found out about his many extramarital affairs.

Obviously, the Million Dollar Woman was none too happy with her husband.

The call did not go well. She wanted to have it out over the phone, but 'Mil' answered, "Let's talk about it when I get home tomorrow."

"You won't be coming home tomorrow," she said, "because you don't live here anymore."

Jeez, getting nailed like that has gotta hurt.

So, 'Mil' did what many desperate men who're about to lose their wife and kids will do.

He called the preacher man.

Basically, he was told to confess his sins, ask for forgiveness, then straighten up and fly right.

Oh, and turn his life over to Jesus.

He added that he found John 3:16 especially relevant, then commented, "Yes, it's John 3:16... not Austin 3:16! That's blasphemy in the eyes of God!", thus admonishing obvious pagan-wrestler 'Stone Cold' Steve Austin, who most assuredly is damned to hell for all eternity.

Amen, and all that.

So now, the "Million Dollar Man", Sting, and a whole host of other formerly heathenized wrestler-types are going to the mat for God.

They're wrestlers. They're Christians. And they're going to take YOU down... the path to salvation!

Good night, Irene!

File this story under: "Just When You Thought Professional Wrestling Couldn't Get Any More Absurd."

posted by Pete 2:33 PM
Saturday, June 07, 2003
[ RANDOM BITS ATE ]

An eighth installment chronicling the True Tales of Pete...
-

= Java Journal =

I went to the Willow House coffee hut the other night.

On the front step, there was a young kid strumming his acoustic guitar and croaking out Leonard Cohen's "So Long, Marianne" while surrounded by a small bevy of Birkenstock-wearing twentysomethings in tie-dyed t-shirts.

It was a regular sing along... Giggan it, folk old skool!

Inside, there was an older guy meandering on an acoustic guitar in the small backroom.

In the main room, there was a rocking - well, as much as one can rock on acoustic guitars, anyway - duo doing it up Simon & Garfunkel style.

Yup, evidently, it was "An Acoustic Guitar in Every Corner" Night at ye ole Willow House.

While ordering my cup of joe, a gaggle of youngsters met up and were so excited to see each other, they all started jumping up and down in unison.

Try the Decaf next time, people. Please.
-

= Blog Versus Blog =

I met my first live fellow blogger.

And the honor goes to Tamsen Yi of 'Be the Water Not the Rock' (http://likesunday.blogspot.com/), who showed up with three of her girlfriends at Paisley Violin coffeehouse, so we could all go on the monthly self-guided tour of downtown Phoenix art galleries.

She brought her friends because, as she explained beforehand, when meeting somebody else from the "blog universe" you need "back up".

Me? I don't need no stinking back up.

So there I was with four hot-looking babes.

Yes, my life had suddenly turned into a bad Reality TV show. And, for the record...

1. I'm not REALLY a millionaire.

2. I didn't bring any roses with me.

3. I didn't marry one of the girls at the end of the evening.

So let's move on, shall we?

The highlights of the evening included a neo-pop art exhibit and a performance troupe that danced with, and ate, fire. But, hey, I'm a guy, so anything involving fire is fine by me. My only regret is that they didn't blow stuff up too. That would've rocked even more.

As we headed back to the car, to drive to another cluster of galleries elsewhere, I suggested we end up at the Bikini Lounge - a Tiki-style bar with a definite "dive" atmosphere.

Tamsen's one art-savvy friend, who had been to that area before, told me out of earshot of the others that she thought the place would freak the other three out.

I bet you know where this tale is headed.

So we parted with the art-savvy friend (who had another engagement elsewhere) and headed on over.

At the intersection across the street from our destination, while stopped at a red light, a homeless drunk bobbed and weaved through the crosswalk in front of us.

Both gals in the front seat instinctively locked their doors. They obviously don't spend much time in downtown Phoenix, and the sight apparently shook them up a bit.

There wasn't any parking in front of the building, so we pulled onto the first side street. It was not a clean, well-lit place.

The ladies decided that enough was enough, and they weren't all too keen on visiting these particular galleries - or the lounge - after all.

Why? Well, I think Tamsen said it best when she said she "liked living" too much.

Personally, if push came to shove, I think these girls could've taken any homeless drunk that happened along, but that's just my opinion.

I remember about ten years ago, when I owned (and lived in) a gallery space downtown, and opened my front door one morning to find a dead body a few feet away. That doesn't happen much anymore. They've really cleaned the neighborhood up since then.

But enough with the nostalgic memories.

Back in the present...

I sometimes forget that people, as a rule, become tentative when they perceive a situation as being possibly dangerous - because I'll jump into a situation that I KNOW is dangerous without a second thought.

What's the worse that could happen? I die? Been there, done that. (See "That Time I Died", 5/20/03, in archives)

So, instead, we ended up at a haughty-taughty restaurant a few miles away.

It was definitely a clean, well-lit place.

Two of Tamsen's friends split a salad. It was one big-ass salad. In fact that's what I think it was called on the menu:

"Big-Ass Salad #6"

It contained all manner of flora and fauna. I felt healthier just looking at it.

I had the open-faced tuna melt. At those prices you'd think you'd get the WHOLE sandwich, but what the hell do I know.

It was a non-smoking restaurant. I ended up drinking five glasses of water, mostly because I didn't know what else to do with my hands. Did I mention the no smoking part?

The piano player pounded out jazzy versions of Billy Joel and Neil Diamond standards while we ate.

Yes, nothing helps digestion like hearing "Sweet Caroline" on the piano.

That was the moment it went from a simple "evening out" to "blog-worthy story."

Hell, it's like I don't even have to make stuff up anymore. Life takes enough surreal turns to keep it imaginative for all of us.

So what did I think of the first fellow blogger I met "in the flesh"?

She's a good egg. Sure, she's a left-leaning political gal, but I can't hold that against her because she's also intelligent with a sarcastic wit and - in case I forgot to mention it earlier - is as cute as a button.
-

= Search String Fun =

It's always interesting to see what keywords, or groupings of words, people use thereby inadvertently finding my web log.

The two most popular seem to be:

aurora+snow

and

brande+roderick

But my favorite has to be the person who used...

pissing+all+over+hisself

Obviously, it's not a phrase I use often. Just often enough for my site to show up on a search engine when it's inputted.

To that end, I'd like to throw out a few more pithy phrases to help others find my site in the future:

slap you upside the head

I'm spitting game with those hootchies

Michael Jackson & Bubbles

if the squirrel had nuts he wouldn't need wood

don't be all up in the kool-aid

Where art thou, Romeo?

Girl, you be jawsin - you're jus' selling woof tickets

It's elementary, my dear Watson
-

= Zoo Story =

I ran into Jocelyn and Jim, of the band World Class Thugs, while out and about.

This reminded me of a story Jocelyn told me the second time I met her, after I plopped my ass down in the chair next to hers and said, "Tell me a story."

It went something like this...

When Jocelyn was seven years old, she went to the zoo with her friend and her friend's mom.

While there, they bought a handful of crackers from a vending machine.

As they were walking along, Jocelyn - doing what many seven years olds would do - started eating the crackers.

Her friend's mom started talking to Jocelyn, but - as she freely admits doing from time to time - she "spaced out" and didn't listen.

Then the mom, raising her voice, said, "Jocelyn! Aren't you listening to me? I said 'Don't eat those crackers... those are for the goats!'"

Even today, one has to forgive Jocelyn when she "spaces out" because she has the ability to play every instrument ever created.

Genius comes with a price, and that price will evidently buy you a handful of goat crackers.

In case anybody is interested, the music of World Class Thugs is somewhere in the neighborhood of They Might Be Giants and Yo La Tengo.

http://www.worldclassthugs.com/

If you happen to email the band, please don't mention the crackers. Jocelyn doesn't know I've posted about it here and I don't want her to stop telling me funny stories when I run into her.

Thank you.
-

= When the Smoke Clears... =

Whenever I buy cigarettes at the usual place, they'll see me coming and have a pack waiting by the register by the time I get there.

I don't know if that's a good thing... or just plain sad.

The other day, I bought my pack and the guy at the register then says, "Can I get a couple of cigarettes from you? I'm completely out and don't get paid until Sunday."

So I gave him two smokes.

What could I possibly add to that to make it any more amusing?

Anyway, I've been seriously thinking about quitting. With all the hacking and coughing up of phlegm, smoking is just not as pleasurable as it once was.

Earlier this week, I was hanging out with my friend, The Artist Known as Jake Martinez, when he started asking me for a cigarette.

Please note, he quit smoking about six months ago.

I've heard most relapses occur within the first six months, and he was on the cusp. If only he could've held out for a couple more weeks.

Once you start up again, it's the fast track to lung cancer and a painful death - but let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

The Artist Known as Jake Martinez was alive and, dammit, he wanted a cigarette and wanted it now.

I'm the kind of guy that won't talk others into doing crazy shit but, if they want to get crazy, well, I'm not going to stop them.

So I gave him a smoke.

"Only two a day," he promised me, "and you keep the pack and ration them out to me."

That lasted like a day. He's now up to half-a-pack a day and going strong. Oh, and I no longer have "pack holding" privileges.

I still need to call the tobacco company and let them know I hooked another one, so I can get my free carton.

Yes, that's one of the Unwritten Smokers' Rules. For every new person we hook, us smokers get a carton gratis.
-

= Soup is Good Food =

Every once in a while, I eat at a local family-owned restaurant at which they make their own soup daily.

The other day, it was spicy chicken and rice soup.

It was to die for.

It was like eating a little "bowl of sex."

It was that good.

I even bought a larger container to take home to eat later. Unfortunately, I didn't have anybody to share this "bowl of sex" with, so I ate it alone.

But enough about my masturbatory eating habits.
-

= Runaway Fetus =

The cover story on this week's (9 June '03) cover of 'Newsweek' read: "Should A Fetus Have Rights?"

So, I thought to myself, "Should they?"

I figured I'd first ask a fetus its opinion, but I couldn't... because it's a goddamn fetus!

To quote from 'Newsweek':

"For decades, abortion opponents have offered moral and ethical arguments about protecting the fetus. Now they're building a legal case, defining the fetus - and even the embryo - as an individual entitled to basic human rights...

..."If they are able to make fetuses people in law with the same standing as women and men, then Roe will be moot," says Planned Parenthood president Gloria Feldt.

... Now 28 states have fetal-homicide laws on the books. In many states, the laws take effect only after a fetus is able to live outside the uterus, around 24 weeks. But 14 states cover a developing child from the moment an embryo is implanted in a woman's uterus - well within the legal time frame for an abortion..." (end quote)

What is this country coming to if, sooner rather than later, a fetus will have as many - or more - rights than the woman carrying it?

Why don't we just give fetuses the right to vote? Or lower the drinking age so fetuses can get liquored up?

No, if fetuses want equal rights, they should have to get them the same way women and blacks did.

Organize and march, baby.

Or maybe that should be "potential baby."

And maybe those last two sentences encapsulate the crux of the issue right there.
-

= Bulb of Pete =

Recently, somebody said to me, "Pete, you're not a 60-watt bulb. You're fluorescent!"

I think it was meant as a compliment.

At least I hope so.

posted by Pete 8:48 AM
Thursday, June 05, 2003
Since my entry on G.W. Bush (May 27 '03) my readership has dropped to about half its usual amount.

I guess some people didn't take too kindly to my comments and stopped reading right quick.

So, out of a sense of fairness, we'll now look at the Democratic presidential candidates for 2004.

My goal, of course, is to offend the OTHER half of my readership, thus reducing the number of hits per day on this blog to a big fat ZERO.

Needless to say... Enjoy.

[ RUNNING ON EMPTY? ]

Many Democrats are running, but who will finish the race? And how many of them strike one as being "Presidential"?

Let's take a look...

HOWARD DEAN (former governor, Vermont)

I've got three words for Dean supporters.

Dukakis.

Mondale.

McGovern.

Sure, there's a slight chance Dean will get the nomination - after all, the Democratic Party faithful eat this far left shit up like most people eat Wheaties for breakfast - but he'd get murderized in a general election.

It'd make the Nixon-McGovern race look like a close call by comparison.

JOHN EDWARDS (U.S. Senator, North Carolina)

John Edwards has a secret plan. He wants to introduce legislation to give the dead the right to vote. Why? Because John Edwards can talk to the dead, and they consistently tell him two things:

1. We're all lifelong Democrats, and dying hasn't changed that.

2. We're all gonna vote for you, John.

So Edwards knows the election is his, if he can just get the "Dead Vote". Oh wait... Wrong John Edward(s). My bad.

RICHARD GEPHARDT (U.S. House, Missouri)

The last time Gephardt ran for president, he had the support of Labor. That was a big plus.

But that was like decades ago. Things change.

Now such support may be viewed as a liability in the eyes of Middle America.

Also, the unions just don't enjoy the power they once had. It used to be, if you crossed them you'd get your legs broken.

Now you pretty much get off with a stern warning.

So, I guess the question is: Can a man be elected president by "stern warning" alone?

That said, Gephardt may be the Dems' last best chance at recapturing the White House in '04. He's "worldly" and politically savvy.

Also, he knows the names of other world leaders. Not that that's a prerequisite to becoming president any longer, but it is something.

He supported the "War in Iraq", which translates (according to my "Political Punditry to English" Dictionary) as "Anti-Terrorism."

If you were Anti-War that translates to "Un-American", which also means your name is probably either Howard Dean or Carol Moseley Braun.

Uh-oh.

Of course, it may as simple as Americans being tired of Bush after four years and will want a little Dick for a change. Who can say?

BOB GRAHAM (U.S. Senator, Florida)

What about Bob? Bob probably says it best when it comes to All That Is Bob.

From a Bob Graham press release (3 May '03):

"Bob Graham Displays Maturity, Expertise and Experience in SC Debate...

...In a lively debate here tonight, U.S. Senator Bob Graham displayed the expertise and experience worthy of the next President of the United States, when he answered a series of questions from his opponents and laid down a marker declaring he comes from "the electable wing of the Democratic Party"...

...Graham was clearly the statesman in the room who the others looked to for insight and Americans will support for the same leadership."

Methinks Bob has a tendency to lay it on a little thick.

He's the consummate Politician's politician.

That's not going to help him.

For some reason, the word "oily" comes to mind. Maybe Graham was a used car salesman in a previous life. I really couldn't say.

Plus, he's from Florida. That state has left a bad taste in voters' mouths ever since the 2000 election. Bad news for Bob.

JOHN KERRY (U.S. Senator, Massachusetts)

Kerry has called for a "new era of service in America", recently unveiling a plan to engage more than one million Americans a year in national service, as part of his campaign.

It includes getting high school students to do community service as a graduation requirement, college tuition in exchange for service, the '100,000 Older Americans in Service' program, and a "rebirth" of the Peace Corps.

It's all about the service, stupid!

Yeah, that's a good way to electrify the electorate.

Get them to do stuff they aren't all that interested in doing in the first place. For free, no less.

Why not promise to raise taxes while you're at it, Kerry?

Obviously, whoever said the Democrats are out of touch with the American public was a complete idiot.

Ok, maybe not.

DENNIS KUCINICH (U.S. House, Ohio)

Hey, Dennis... Howard Dean called.

He wants his campaign rhetoric back.

JOE LIEBERMAN (U.S. Senator, Connecticut)

Well, I had a long entry prepared on Lieberman, but it was full of sex and violence so I had better just say...

C E N S O R E D

...and leave it at that.

CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN (Former U.S. Senator, Illinois)

She's a black woman running as a major party candidate for president.

That's gonna hurt her.

Who would've thunk? Ain't America grand?

I remember when Jesse Jackson ran in the 1980s, and when he started winning primaries most of the big weekly news magazines ran headlines like, "What Does Jesse Want?"

Gee, maybe to be president?

Things may've changed in the last twenty years, but they haven't changed that much. Sure, Moseley-Braun won't have to ride in the back of her campaign bus, but neither does she have a snowball's chance in hell of getting nominated.

No matter how good she may be.

I don't agree with the sentiment, but that's just the way it is.

Yup, ain't America grand?

A cornerstone of her campaign is "investing in children" and their future. She's very pro-children, unlike the other candidates who, I guess, hate children?

REV. AL SHARPTON (Civil Rights Leader)

Recently, a member of his staff informed Sharpton that he is, in fact, running for president.

Reportedly, Sharpton replied, "President of what?" then grumbled about always being the last to know about these things.

So, he went out campaigning. This more or less consisted of standing on a street corner and railing against The Unfair Treatment of Blacks at the Hands of the Rich White Man.

When the TV news crews didn't show up, having already seen this particular episode of "Sharpton Unplugged", he, instead, kissed a few babies and went home.

While at home, he ranted about The Unfair Treatment of Blacks at the Hands of the Rich White Man until dinner was ready.

At which point, he said, "Somebody was cooking dinner? Why am I always the last one to know about these things?"
-

So let's recap, shall we? We have Lieberman, Moseley Braun and Sharpton - who are Jewish, a woman, and black, respectively.

Attention, race fans - we've just hit the winning "Unelectable Trifecta".

Again, I'm not saying I LIKE it... just that that's the way it is in America today.

Then there's Dean and Dean-Lite (aka Kucinich). Like that's gonna happen.

There's Bob Graham, about whom I couldn't say anything that Graham himself couldn't say better and with more false conviction.

And let's not forget Kerry and his "Wake Me Up When It's All Over" campaign. Yawn.

Which leaves us with Edwards and Gephardt.

Flip a coin, people.

No, the best chance the Democrats have in '04 isn't any particular candidate, but how poorly the economy is doing by Election Day. Americans have notoriously short memories and will, by that time, be saying, "What War with Iraq?" and "Middle East Peace Plan? The Middle East of where?"

As some hillbilly once said, "It's the economy, stupid."

Or perhaps President Bush said it best, back in Oct.'02, when he stated, "Let me tell you my thoughts about tax relief. When your economy is kind of ooching along, it's important to let people have more of their own money."

Word!

It's too bad Gary Hart decided not to run. He realistically could've ended up being the nominee.

Instead, he's allegedly banging some chick while his wife is at a rotary club meeting.

See, now THAT'S Presidential!

posted by Pete 12:44 AM



home